Orbyt vs Comprehensive.io.
Comprehensive is the startup dashboard. Orbyt is the full map.
Real-time compensation benchmarking for VC-backed startups
Start on Build.At a glance.
Infrastructure coverage.
What Comprehensive.io is.
Comprehensive.io is a compensation benchmarking platform founded in 2022 by Roger Lee, focused on VC-backed startups in major U.S. hubs. The product pulls real-time data from connected customer payroll systems and surfaces benchmarks through a polished HR-facing dashboard. For startups inside the customer network, the dataset is fresh and the UX is modern. Outside that network the coverage thins: public companies, enterprise SaaS, frontier AI labs that are not customers, non-tech industries, and regional employers see the dataset drop off a cliff. Comprehensive has paid APIs for customers but no free public tier, no MCP manifest, and no CC BY license on the data. The product is built for HR at Series A through Series C companies. Orbyt Intelligence covers 3,500 roles across 81 U.S. cities whether or not a company has ever signed a contract with us: source-driven coverage, not customer-driven coverage.
Pricing, head to head.
Comprehensive.io's consumer UI is free to browse without an account. Paid API and dashboard access is published for Starter tiers (roughly $500 to $2,000 per month for early-stage startups) and quote-only for Growth and Enterprise tiers. There is no self-serve developer tier and no way to evaluate the API before a contract. Orbyt Intelligence publishes its full pricing grid: Build at $99 per month (60 req/min, AI Role Taxonomy engine), scaling through Pro at $299 per month (300 req/min, MCP server, all six engines), Scale at $1,999 per month (1,500 req/min, Company Signals, webhooks), and Enterprise at $4,999 per month (5,000 req/min, 99.95% uptime target, SSO). Every tier is visible at orbyt-intelligence/pricing: no sales call required. For a developer, a researcher, or a startup founder who wants to validate salary data against a use case before committing budget, Comprehensive is closed and Orbyt is open at $99/mo.
Orbyt wins.
A slice, or the map.
Six AI engines covering the full labor market: Role Taxonomy, Skill Premiums, Skill Half-Life, Comp by Funding Stage, Company Signals, Hiring Velocity. Comprehensive shows you the VC-startup slice; Orbyt shows you the whole map.
MCP server with six locked tools for Claude Code, ChatGPT, and autonomous agents. Comprehensive has no MCP.
Build tier at $99/mo gets you in. No procurement, no $500-$2,000 starter contract, no Growth-tier quote dance.
Bloomberg-grade lineage on every data point via /lineage. Resolves to BLS, H-1B LCA, SEC filings, postings, community submissions.
3,500+ roles vs Comprehensive's startup-centric subset
81 U.S. cities vs Comprehensive's major-metro focus
Orbyt Intelligence covers the market Comprehensive does not. 3,500 roles across 81 U.S. cities. AI labs, Big Tech, enterprise SaaS, public companies, non-tech industries. Public API from $99/mo on Build. MCP server for AI agents. CC BY 4.0 license. The word Comprehensive describes one of these two products. It is not the one with that name.
Feature by feature.
On real-time freshness inside the customer network, Comprehensive wins: payroll-feed data refreshes continuously for participating companies. On coverage breadth, Orbyt wins by a wide margin. Comprehensive's dataset is concentrated on VC-backed startups in major hubs; Orbyt covers 3,500 roles across 81 U.S. cities including FAANG, enterprise SaaS, public companies cross-referenced against SEC proxy filings, and frontier AI labs regardless of customer status. On developer experience, it is not close: Comprehensive has no self-serve API tier, no MCP manifest, no OpenAPI spec, no MCP tool-call surface. Orbyt ships all of those starting at $99/mo on the Build tier. On forward modeling, Orbyt projects through 2030 with a public methodology; Comprehensive reports what is current. On license, Orbyt is CC BY 4.0 (cite, redistribute, train models, embed in products); Comprehensive data is proprietary and contract-locked. On AI-era role coverage specifically, Orbyt tracks 598 AI-specific roles with leveling frameworks for Anthropic, OpenAI, DeepMind, Meta AI, and Cohere; Comprehensive's coverage depends on whether those labs are customers.
Who each is for.
Use Comprehensive.io if you are an HR or People Ops lead at a VC-backed startup in the Comprehensive customer network, you need real-time benchmarks against peer companies in your slice, and you value the dashboard UX. For that audience, inside that network, the product is a solid choice. Use Orbyt Intelligence if your comp data needs extend outside the VC-backed startup ecosystem, if you are a developer building a feature, if you are an AI team running agent workflows, if you are a researcher citing data in a paper, or if your coverage requirements include public companies, enterprise SaaS, or frontier AI labs that may not be Comprehensive customers. The distinction is sharp: Comprehensive is a private club, Orbyt is the public square. Both can be legitimate, depending on who the buyer is and what the use case covers.
Bottom line, in 2026.
In 2026, Comprehensive.io is an excellent product for a narrow audience and Orbyt Intelligence is the only open programmatic alternative that scales past that audience. The name Comprehensive describes Orbyt's product, not theirs. 3,500 roles. 81 cities. Public API from $99/mo on Build. MCP server for AI agents. Forward projections through 2030. CC BY 4.0 license. Every one of those features describes what a compensation data product should ship in 2026 if it is designed for the whole market, not just the part of the market willing to connect payroll feeds to a vendor. Comprehensive will keep owning the VC-backed startup slice. Orbyt owns everything else.
How to migrate from Comprehensive.io to Orbyt.
Migrating from Comprehensive.io to Orbyt Intelligence is straightforward because the two products solve overlapping problems. If you are using Comprehensive for startup comp benchmarking and your coverage needs have grown past the VC-backed network, here is the path.
- Sign up for an Orbyt Intelligence account at intelligence/signup. Build at $99/mo unlocks 60 req/min with Bearer authentication and the AI Role Taxonomy engine.
- Generate an API key from the API dashboard. The OpenAPI 3.1 spec is at /openapi-intelligence.yaml for code generation.
- Map your current Comprehensive role taxonomy to Orbyt role slugs. Orbyt's coverage extends past the startup slice into AI labs, FAANG, enterprise SaaS, and public companies; if you have been working around Comprehensive's coverage gaps, those gaps disappear here.
- For AI agents, drop the Orbyt MCP manifest URL into Claude Desktop or ChatGPT Actions. Manifest is at /mcp-intelligence.json. Comprehensive has no MCP story; Orbyt does.
- Replace any Comprehensive CSV exports or API calls with `/api/v1/intelligence/salaries` queries. Orbyt returns structured total comp (base, equity, bonus, signing) with source citations and percentile bands.
- Confirm your citation complies with CC BY 4.0. Orbyt's required attribution is 'Orbyt Intelligence, Q2 2026' plus a link to the dataset. Comprehensive's data under their terms cannot be redistributed in a derivative product.
Most teams finish the migration in under an hour once the role mapping is done. The coverage expansion is the biggest immediate win: companies and roles that were gaps in Comprehensive's startup-focused dataset are first-class in Orbyt's. Forward projections through 2030 and the CC BY 4.0 license are the longer-term wins for anyone building on top of the data.
Start on Build.Where Comprehensive.io lands. Where it does not.
Where Comprehensive.io is strong
- Modern compensation benchmarking UX
- Strong positioning in VC-backed startup ecosystem
- API exists for paid customers
- Real compensation transparency advocacy and public presence
- Real-time data feeds from their customer base
Where Comprehensive.io falls short
- Dataset concentrated on VC-backed startups. Thin outside that slice.
- No public API tier
- No MCP or AI-agent integration
- Narrower role and city coverage than Orbyt
- No forward projections through 2030
- Heavy HR-buyer focus. Not built for developers or candidates.
What Comprehensive.io cannot do.
The specific gaps. Every one of them is a gap Orbyt Intelligence fills below.
The dataset is a slice, not a map.
Comprehensive.io coverage is concentrated on VC-backed startups in major hubs. That is by design, and their customers in that segment are well served. Step outside the segment, and the coverage gets thin fast. Public companies, enterprise SaaS at scale, frontier AI labs that are not already Comprehensive customers, and industries outside tech see sharp coverage drops.
No public API tier.
Comprehensive.io has APIs for paid customers. There is no self-serve developer tier and no way to evaluate the API before a contract. For a developer, a researcher, or a startup founder who wants to validate the data against a use case before committing, the doors are closed. Orbyt's Build tier at $99/mo is the published alternative: instant access, no sales call.
No MCP. AI agents cannot use Comprehensive as a tool.
Claude Desktop, ChatGPT Actions, autonomous agents in Langchain or crewai pipelines: none of them can call Comprehensive as a first-class MCP tool. As of Q2 2026, there is no MCP manifest on the Comprehensive.io roadmap. An agent that needs salary data inside a workflow has to use a different provider or fall back to scraping.
No forward projections. No 2030 model.
Comprehensive surfaces real-time data from customer payroll feeds. That is useful for lagging questions (what do startups pay today?) but silent on the leading questions (what will AI engineer comp look like in 2028?). Orbyt Intelligence publishes forward projections through 2030 for every role and city, with the methodology disclosed.
Proprietary license. Cannot cite or redistribute.
Comprehensive data is proprietary. If you are writing a paper, building a public comp transparency tool, training a model, or embedding the data in a product that serves your own customers, the license restricts what you can do. Orbyt Intelligence is CC BY 4.0, which explicitly permits all of the above with attribution.
Projections through 2030
Comprehensive.io tells you today. Orbyt tells you 2030.
Director of Engineering, Microsoft (Seattle). Annual total comp, projected year over year with methodology disclosed.
Feature by feature.
| Feature | Orbyt Intelligence | Comprehensive.io |
|---|---|---|
| Public API with transparent pricingDecisive | ||
| MCP support for AI agentsDecisive | ||
| Total comp breakdown | ||
| Roles covered | 3,500+ | Startup subset |
| Cities covered (U.S.) | 81 | Major hubs |
| Forward projections to 2030 | ||
| Non-startup company coverage | Broad (FAANG, enterprise, public) | Limited |
| Update cadence | Quarterly | Real-time from customers |
| Data licenseDecisive | CC BY 4.0 | Proprietary |
| Pricing transparent | Yes (paid tiers) | |
| Free consumer UX to browse | ||
| OpenAPI spec published | ||
| Target buyer | Developers, AI teams, candidates, HR | Startup HR/People teams |
Based on publicly available feature lists and documentation as of Q2 2026. Updated quarterly.
They named their product Comprehensive. We built the comprehensive dataset. Names are cheap. Coverage is not.
Common questions.
More comparisons.
Also from Orbyt
The same data, everywhere else.
You have the comparison.
Now query the data.
Build at $99/mo. 60 req/min. Scales to 5,000 req/min on Enterprise.